Physical Health Plan
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Fitness
  • Mental Health
  • Recipes
  • Workouts
  • Food & Nutrition
  • Home
  • Fitness
  • Mental Health
  • Recipes
  • Workouts
  • Food & Nutrition
No Result
View All Result
Physical Health Plan
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

4 Insurers, 5 Policies to Pay $73M Sandy Hook Settlement Against Gunmaker Remington

Related articles

What Should You Do If You’re in a Car Accident While Out of State?

Case study: Snapsheet’s virtual claims management technology

A federal bankruptcy court in Alabama has approved insurance payments totaling $73 million by four insurers to the families of the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre. The settlement with gunmaker Remington Arms and its companies, which are now in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, was announced yesterday.

At the time of the shooting, four insurers had a total of five policies in effect on Remington Arms and its companies. The four insurers sharing in the settlement payout to the families of the shooting’s victims are Ironshore (a Liberty Mutual subsidiary), James River Insurance Co., ACE (now Chubb), and North American Capacity Insurance Co. (Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corp.).

According to the court, the total stated limits of these five policies is $76 million. However, James River previously paid $2.5 million on a different related claim, reducing the potentially available limits to $73.5 million.

In addition, as part of the order, James River must reserve $500,000 for a separate suit brought by plaintiff Precious Seguin in the event the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirms the judgment in her favor. If Seguin’s judgment is reversed, then James River will pay the $500,000 to the Sandy Hook families.

Twenty students and six adults were killed on Dec. 14, 2012 in Newtown, Connecticut, by shooter Adam Lanza. Lanza used a Remington Bushmaster AR-15 rifle in the shooting. This settlement involves nine families of five adults and four children who were killed.

The settlement marks the first time a gunmaker has been held responsible for a mass shooting in the country. The plaintiffs’ lawyers took the unusual route of focusing not on Remington’s manufacturing of the gun used but on its marketing. While the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act grants firearms makers immunity from product liability, the plaintiffs argued that law did not apply. Instead, they focused on Remington’s “aggressive and violence-glorifying marketing” of its AR-15s as an unfair trade practice and a violation of Connecticut law. The legal strategy sought to uncover how Remington marketed the AR-15 to “young, violence-prone men.”

The families and their lawyers hope the settlement sends a message to insurers and banks as well as to gunmakers and marketers.

“These nine families have shared a single goal from the very beginning: to do whatever they could to help prevent the next Sandy Hook. It is hard to imagine an outcome that better accomplishes that goal,” said Josh Koskoff, lead counsel and partner at the Connecticut law firm Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, which represented the Sandy Hook families. “This victory should serve as a wake-up call not only to the gun industry, but also the insurance and banking companies that prop it up.

“For the gun industry, it’s time to stop recklessly marketing all guns to all people for all uses and instead ask how marketing can lower risk rather than court it. For the insurance and banking industries, it’s time to recognize the financial cost of underwriting companies that elevate profit by escalating risk. Our hope is that this victory will be the first boulder in the avalanche that forces that change.”

In addition to full insurance payouts, the plaintiffs insisted on another condition. The gunmaker must make public thousands of pages of internal documents and depositions that the families say will unveil Remington’s wrongdoing. They claim that the company, driven by parent private equity firm Cerberus, put profits over public safety and changed its previous approach to marketing firearms in favor of an “aggressive, multi-media campaign that pushed sales of AR-15s through product placement in first-person shooter video games and by touting the AR-15’s effectiveness as a killing machine.”

According to Koskoff, an earlier $33 million settlement proposal in July by Ironshore and James River was rejected.

Photo: In this Jan. 28, 2013, file photo, firearms training unit Detective Barbara J. Mattson, of the Connecticut State Police, holds up a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, the same make and model of gun used by Adam Lanza in the Sandy Hook School shooting. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill, File)

[Read More…]

Previous Post

Massachusetts Firefighters With Cancer Sue Companies Over ‘Forever Chemicals’

Next Post

Insurtech Startup Slide Agrees to Take On Troubled St. Johns HO Business

Related Posts

Uncategorized

What Should You Do If You’re in a Car Accident While Out of State?

October 9, 2024
Uncategorized

Case study: Snapsheet’s virtual claims management technology

May 20, 2022
Uncategorized

Arbella Insurance partners up to launch Insurance Academy

May 20, 2022
Uncategorized

Ford Recalls 39,000 U.S. SUVs After Engine Fire Reports

May 20, 2022
Uncategorized

Growth of Massive New Mexico Wildfire Slowed

May 20, 2022
Uncategorized

Policies’ Arbitration, AOB Endorsements are Unconstitutional, Florida Lawsuit Claims

May 20, 2022

Search..

No Result
View All Result

Subscribe Us

By clicking submit, I authorize Physical Health Plan and its affiliated companies to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, (2) supplement the information that I provide with additional information lawfully obtained from other sources, like demographic data from public sources, interests inferred from web page views, or other data relevant to what might interest me, like past purchase or location data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email with offers for goods and services from any category at the email address provided, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

Recommended

Step by Step Instructions to Choose the Right Running Chews

December 24, 2021

Hot Yoga Is No Better for You Than Regular Yoga, Study Says

December 23, 2021
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
  • Unsubscribe
  • Privacy Choices

© 2025 Physical Health Plan. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Fitness
  • Mental Health
  • Recipes
  • Workouts
  • Food & Nutrition

© 2025 Physical Health Plan. All Rights Reserved.

Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset